EXPERTISE / SPECIALIST SERVICES

STIG Assessment & Remediation

Connect every finding to evidence and action.

Assess applicable Security Technical Implementation Guide requirements, organize supporting evidence, and guide remediation through verification.

Discuss this service ↗

Is this the right starting point?

Who this helps

System owners, application teams, and security reviewers who need traceable STIG assessments and a practical remediation workflow.

Common starting points

An upcoming assessment, an evidence backlog, unclear benchmark applicability, or open findings that need remediation and retest planning.

What to prepare

System boundaries, benchmark version and release if known, assessment dates, existing checklists, and general evidence gaps. Exchange sensitive evidence through an agreed channel.

01 / ENGAGEMENT SCOPE

Focus on the meaningful gaps.

Applicability and baseline

Identify the systems, benchmark versions, and applicable requirements within the agreed assessment boundary.

Assessment and evidence

Review automated results and manual checks, document finding rationale, and identify missing evidence.

Remediation and review

Develop corrective actions, document exceptions for the responsible authority, and retest agreed changes.

02 / PRACTICAL OUTPUTS

A clear path from review to action.

Deliverables are tailored to the agreed systems, assessment boundary, and engagement objectives.

01
Assessment checklist with benchmark versions and finding rationale
02
Evidence index and prioritized remediation plan
03
Retest summary with remaining findings and documented exceptions

WORKING TOGETHER

From a clear scope to a practical handoff.

Access, timing, deliverables, and any implementation or retest work are agreed before the engagement begins.

01
Agree the boundary
Define goals, systems, access, permitted work, deliverables, and operational constraints.
02
Assess with context
Review the agreed architecture, controls, and evidence; prioritize actionable gaps.
03
Plan accountable changes
Connect corrective actions to owners, dependencies, due dates, and acceptance criteria.
04
Verify and hand over
Retest agreed changes, summarize remaining decisions, and hand evidence to the maintaining team.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Plan the review
with confidence.

What makes a finding ready for closure?

An agreed corrective action should be followed by a documented retest tied to the affected asset and benchmark requirement. Planned work alone is not verification.

Does Avizium approve exceptions or issue an authorization?

No. Assessment and remediation support can organize evidence and document residual risk. Exception approval, certification, and authorization decisions remain with the responsible authority.

03 / GET STARTED

Define the scope together.

Describe the system types, applicable benchmarks if known, and assessment timeline. Assessment support does not confer certification, authorization to operate, or approval of exceptions.

Begin with discovery, agree the scope and deliverables, assess the environment, then review findings and validate agreed changes.

Share only general, unclassified information in the inquiry form. Arrange an appropriate exchange method before sharing sensitive findings or evidence.

Talk to an engineer ↗

AI Application Security

Review AI-enabled applications across models, retrieval, APIs, and connected tools. Apply application-security and cloud-architecture discipline to identify exploitable gaps and verify practical fixes across AWS, OpenShift, and hybrid environments.

Explore this service

AWS & Cloud Security Architecture

Review AWS and hybrid cloud architecture across identity, network segmentation, data protection, and operational visibility. Connect design decisions to practical implementation and verification.

Explore this service

OpenShift & Container Security

Review OpenShift and Kubernetes architecture across private and hybrid cloud, from cluster access and workload isolation to AWS integration and verifiable controls.

Explore this service